Sunday, April 14, 2019

Characteristics of Just Laws And Views Essay Example for Free

Characteristics of Just Laws And Views EssayA fitting uprightness has a number of widely recognized characteristics. A just law is characterized by the followingtreats all in all state evenlyThe nonion of personifyity is an important aspect of the law. Although a just law may be providing equality it doesnt always occur that way. For example, a wealthy someone may be able to present profound representation, but those people who dismisst afford legitimate representation will be disadvantaged and will not have an equal prospect before the law. is based on generally held religious or ethical preceptsThe common law legal system is the product of various historical influences, many of which were the religious and moral viewpoints of different metres. In forthwiths society, ethics and how they coincide with the law ar being replaced by the need for the law to cherish society as a whole and consider economic interests.is utilitarianUtilitarianism is the theory which sugg ests the law aims to discipline the greatest possible happiness for the greatest possible number of people.stresses consensus and social cohesion above allDemocracy helps create legal consensus. Democratic processes provide all citizens within the state with the opportunity to fix or create the law. Democratic processes will generally require a majority or consensus to carry a law into being. Democratic processes are designed to endure the survival and well being of the residential district through stressing consensus.allows for general principles to be mitigated in individual cases Mitigation allows for fairness. The law attempts to treat everyone equally that = everyone in similar situations is taxed the same, everyone who commits the same crime is given the same penalty. However the courts have discretion to flinch the penalty according to the circumstances. aims to redress inequalitiesIt leaves people freeTo the extent that people do not jibe the law, a just law will leav e people free.It takes into account of limitations in material resources.It can be invoked without undue delay.A just law should deal with a legal problem or dispute as soon as practicable after that problem or dispute arises. This is because peoples memories fade and so their evidence becomes less reliable as time passes. But this is not always the case, as currently the Australian legal system has lengthy delays and cases take long periods of time to reach the courts.Formal Equality theory side of the actual practice. Here in theory everyone in Australia is do by equally and given the same opportunities Institutionalized equality- this is the practical side to it. Although it seems everyone in Australia is equal in that location are people in sub groups in society who are part of a nonage and arent able to benefit from the opportunities. E.g. of formal equalityEveryone has to right to access the law.Everyone has the right to vote equality OF OPPORTUNITY-Equal treatment of peopl e in access to employment and services. ..So everyone has the right to apply for a job. They have equal rights to a safe working environment. (work cover). Everyone has the equal opportunity to access the minimum wage. EQUALITY BEFORE THE LAW-Everyone is treated equally in their dealings with the law. E.g. The rule of law. So everyone has the implied right to legal representation. All Australian citizens are allowed to contest evidence put forward during court (natural justice cross examination). EQUALITY OF OUTCOMES-A practice whereby the law, insurance or precedent aims to ensure that, regardless of educational or socioeconomic background, or inequality of opportunity, the progeny of certain exercises will be equality..so legal aid, if people arent able to afford legal representation they are given the opportunity to apply for legal aid.Does formal equality before the law hides institutionalized inequality?This relates most to EQUALITY OF OUTCOMES because this area is where the law has its most flaws. Although everyone might have the same opportunity not everyone is able to earn that system. For example unskilled migrants who come to Australia looking for a repair life think Australia has equal everythingtrue but its not equal if you go int understand it and arent familiar with it. For example if you come from a non English speaking background to Australia and get into nettle with the law or are being framed or a victim of fraud and development how are you going to access the law and legal representation if you cant speak the language and dont understand the system. Therefore not an equal opportunity.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.